Skip to content


Human Events, Bipartisan As Ever

President Obama spoke at his SOTU Address and we’ve witnessed him trying to reach out to both party’s.


Whether you are a Democrat or a Republican, most of you, hopefully, will want to try.  Unfortunately, there are others that don’t want to try, even for a moment. Some will try to create even more division, for reasons we can only imagine.

Here is one response from that lovely journalistic wonder, “Human Events:”


President Obama pledged in his State of the Union Address to promote open homosexual aggression within the ranks of the military, by directly recruiting Congressmen and Senators in 2010 to overturn the “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” law that saves troops lives and already guarantees equality. Ignoring a letter signed by over 1,150 retired military flag and general officers, who asked Obama to enforce the 1993 Clinton-era law that currently prohibits open homosexual aggression in the military, Obama instead sacrificed military readiness, unit cohesion, and safety of all American troops, to prioritize his special relationship with less than 1% of the American population who claimed to be homosexual in the last census.

“This year, I will work with Congress and our military to finally repeal the law that denies gay men and women the right to serve the country they love,” Obama boldly misled, repeating the vow he made during a speech Oct. 10th before a gay rights group. (The truth is homosexuals already now have the right to serve, so long as they keep their sexual aggression to themselves.)  ”If you adhere to our common values, you should be treated no different than anyone else,” Obama said oxymoronically, defining “equality” and “values” as a sudden endorsement of illegal acts of sod omy long banned by the Uniform Code of Military Justice.  The Joint Chiefs sat stone-faced silent, aghast at Obama’s plan, but powerless to publicly oppose their own Commander-In-Chief.  We must be their voice...

s a former Navy Chaplain and Air Force Academy graduate, having served during wartime combat operations, in close quarters with Sailors onboard a combat cruiser, and having personally counseled both straight and homosexual sericemembers, I can personally attest the last thing our Sailors need is a lack of trust or suspicion toward their fellow shipmates.  Our uniformed servicemembers very lives depend daily on their ability to trust each other, without worry about being ogled, made advances upon, or violated by those with whom they share common sleeping quarters and showering facilities, 24/7 both on and off duty.  Friends, do you care about protecting our military’s trust, unit cohesion, and saving our troops lives?  Take action today...

In the Pentagon however, Marine Corps Commandant Gen. James T. Conway has emerged in internal deliberations as the most outspoken opponent of permitting gay men and women to serve openly in the U.S. military, according to the Washington Times.

.

WHY KEEP OPEN HOMOSEXUALITY OUT OF THE MILITARY?

Four reasons:  1) Allowing open homosexuality especially hurts unit cohesion and would cost American lives in war, damaging the trust shared in close proximity, common sleeping quarters and showering facilities that are unavoidable in close combat.  2) Men and women do not share the same showers for obvious reasons, so why force men to share showers with openly homosexual men?  This fact alone would hurt recruiting.  3) The rampant spread of the HIV-AIDS virus contaminates the blood often shared by necessity on the battlefield.  Soldiers requiring blood-transfusions and medics would be immediately endangered.  4) “Gay promotion quotas” would soon be forced upon presently impartial promotion boards, causing a burdensome rise in sexually-charged “equal opportunity” complaints against commanders, especially those who offend gays by inadvertently speaking of their traditional Judeo-Christian faith.



Posted in Politics.

  • Rebel

    Comrades Anomaly and Brenda: I know that homosexuality is one of the favorite causes of the left. I also know that you assume the right is homophobic. Please put your liberal talking points leaflet away and listen to me for a moment.

    I don’t care about people’s sexual orientation. I don’t care what people do in the privacy of their own homes. I think that homosexuals are born that way and it is not a choice for them. So I am not some narrow-minded bigot okay?

    I think that homosexuals should stay out of the military for the same reason that I do not think women should serve side by side with men in the military. War is war and combat is combat. We cannot afford the distractions of sexuality in such situations. There is a huge problem with women getting pregnant in the service because human nature is human nature and it has no place in combat situations. Women can serve in the military in an admin capacity, but they should not be in the field of combat.

    I don’t think that 1/3 of women in the military are raped. I think that is a bogus statistic dreamed up by someone with a femenist agenda. I do think that when you send women into a situation where men outnumber women 10-1 such as Iraq then there are going to be problems. It just doesn’t make sense. War is a very nasty business and women are not suited to it. We don’t need gay men in combat situation for the same reason. These brave men are risking their lives and it is bad enough without such complications.

    All this concern about homosexual rights in the military is political correctness at it’s worst. We had dozens of people killed at Fort Hood because the Military was so politically correct that it ignored the warnings about the anti-American and pro terrorists sentiments of the officer involved.

    Go back to global warming or blame Bush for your problems. Stay the f&*ck out of the military. Let the brave professionals in our military do their jobs.

  • Rebel

    Comrade Anomaly100: What is it with you liberals and homosexuality? You are obsessed! Gays in the military is the all time stupidest non-issue ever. I will never forget when Slick Willie aka Bubbah had only been in an office a few days and he announced his “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” program. I couldn’t believe that we had this new President with everything that he had to do and he would choose an issue like that to kick off his Presidency. I don’t know what the Messiah is doing dragging this old chestnut out with all the other problems he is faced with. The only thing I can think of is it is some kind of a coded message or a payoff to a special interest group.

    I really don’t care what people do behind closed doors, but there is no place for gays in the military. When men are in a combat situation or in the barracks or the showers the last thing they need to worry about is some other guy staring at their ass.

    Congratulations Comrade Anomaly you have now entered the highest echelon of kookdom. Only a select few liberals have reached this level. There is truly no hope for you. You have wandered off the reservation with this rant.

    • Anomaly100

      @Rebel; I am not obsessed with “homosexuality” at all. Let’s start with a few facts shall we? 1/3rd of the women in the military have been raped. The question should be, how can any man find war sexually arousing, so much so, that they rape a woman? Before you show outrage to other men, perhaps you should voice concern over the women that are raped by the very people she is fighting next to.

      It’s astounding that any man could be at war, in the midst of battle & find it too irresistible to grab the first man they see and start humping his derriere, while at the same time, slaughtering our enemies that want to see us obliterated. Me thinks thou doth protest too much Rebel. As far as “kookdom,” it is not me that call men ‘aggressive sexual predators’. No, it’s your people that call homosexuality some sort of agenda. I wrote a few sentences, copy & pasted Human Events most recent gay bashing, and shared it on my blog. Rebel, look out! A gay man is behind you, staring at your ass! See how ridiculous that sounds? Why don’t you men care about the women in the military? Or is it only the men you care about? Hmm…

  • http://twitter.com/uncajoe/status/8441777002 Unca Joe

    New Post: Human Events, Bipartisan As Ever: President Obama spoke at his SOTU Address and we’ve… http://bit.ly/cYK965 via @FreakOutNation

  • Brenda

    I would suggest that the only soldiers who don’t already know who is gay or lesbian in their cadre are those who are deeply in their own dark little closets.

    Also, the Human Events journalist is a little confused as to his phraseology; Homosexual Aggression is what is brought forth when reading an article so ineptly crafted and exquisitely neurotic as the Human Events piece on topic.

    • Anomaly100

      @Brenda: Well said. Also, you were very generous to call him a “journalist.” ;-)