Comments on: David Duke Debunks Tea Pary Racism!

By: lotro

lotro — Sun, 23 May 2010 11:12:07 +0000

Your blog is so informative ?keep up the good work!!!!

By: Dofus Kamas

Dofus Kamas — Fri, 14 May 2010 20:10:34 +0000

It was interesting. You seem very knowledgeable in ypour field.

By: Dofus Kamas

Dofus Kamas — Thu, 13 May 2010 18:53:19 +0000

You made some good points there. I did a search on the topic and found most people will agree with your blog.

By: ffxiv gil

ffxiv gil — Wed, 12 May 2010 19:57:07 +0000

It sounds like you’re creating problems yourself by trying to solve this issue instead of looking at why their is a problem in the first place

By: Wordpress Themes

Wordpress Themes — Fri, 30 Apr 2010 15:15:53 +0000

Nice fill someone in on and this enter helped me alot in my college assignement. Say thank you you for your information.

By: LeavingMyMarc.com » In Defense of the Tea Party Movement…

LeavingMyMarc.com » In Defense of the Tea Party Movement… — Wed, 28 Apr 2010 02:29:57 +0000

[...] Click here to find out where this came from. [...]

By: Hank

Hank — Tue, 27 Apr 2010 14:45:44 +0000

al1948 – Typical Alinsky.

Rule 5: Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon. It’s hard to counterattack ridicule, and it infuriates the opposition, which then reacts to your advantage.

According to Alinsky, the main job of the organizer is to bait an opponent into reacting. “The enemy properly goaded and guided in his reaction will be your major strength.”

He further states, “…he suggests that the perennial question, “Does the end justify the means?” is meaningless as it stands: the real and only question regarding the ethics of means and ends is, and always has been, “Does this particular end justify this particular means?”

This is the code of ethics the left and this Administration operates under. Nice? Eh??

By: Jason Hurrican Allen

Jason Hurrican Allen — Tue, 27 Apr 2010 02:25:53 +0000

The Tea Party isn't racist. David Duke tells you so. http://tinyurl.com/2frboqn

By: TheTXI

TheTXI — Tue, 27 Apr 2010 01:52:34 +0000

@Hank

“Is it that they are not doing a good job of casting them out? Or is it that their detractors are doing a BETTER job of emphasizing them and trying to mainstream them?”

That’s a good question and it’s worth asking. But I guess I could say that if the opposite side is having a better time emphasizing them, that would sort of imply that they are still there and able to be emphasized.

Not that I expect there to be a full blown purge of 100% of unsavory elements from the movement (that’s just unrealistic).

By: al1948

al1948 — Tue, 27 Apr 2010 00:29:24 +0000

“think what’s most important here is that we do not lump David Duke, the Tea Party and the KKK together. Because that would just be wrong and [...]”

On the contrary, it is extremely important to keep Duke’s Nazi and KKK relationship as public as possible. Let the Teapartyers try to explain why they are not white supremacists.

By: Uncle Sam

Uncle Sam — Mon, 26 Apr 2010 21:57:42 +0000

commerce between a Master and Slave is despotism…Nothing is more certainly written in the book of fate……..Help me as I did not find that written on Thomas Jeffersons’ monument. I do see “We hold these truths to be self evident that all Men are crerated equal…” Is this the type of mis quoting that occurs between you Dave and this past dead President.? All white european’s own America and need to save their heritage here in America, A land you by War, or hook or crook got from the Indians….Wow! you are so blinded that you can not see the trees because of the forest. Please let me be by you when you are on your death bed, I would like to be present when you weep and cry for forgiveness before yo meet your maker.

By: David Duke, the Tea Party and the KKK — You could see this coming, right? « Media « William K. Wolfrum Chronicles

Mon, 26 Apr 2010 20:59:41 +0000

[...] think what’s most important here is that we do not lump David Duke, the Tea Party and the KKK together. Because that would just be wrong and [...]

By: Uncle Sam

Uncle Sam — Mon, 26 Apr 2010 20:49:39 +0000

Poor mr david duke. You take a secion of the acts dated back in 1790 where it is showing that the FIRST nationalization law itself was wrong and against everyone other the white men.:
The original United States Naturalization Law of March 26, 1790 (1 Stat. 103) provided the first rules to be followed by the United States in the granting of national citizenship. This law limited naturalization to aliens who were “free white persons” and thus left out indentured servants, slaves, free blacks, and later Asians, as well as women.
This is not JUST YOUR country, the land of milk and honey belongs to everyone and you will share it.The 1790 Act also limited naturalization to persons of “good moral character”; the law required a set period of residence in the United States prior to naturalization, specifically two years in the country and one year in the state of residence when applying for citizenship. When those requirements were met, an immigrant could file a Petition for Naturalization with “any common law court of record” having jurisdiction over his residence asking to be naturalized. Once convinced of the applicant’s good moral character, the court would administer an oath of allegiance to support the Constitution of the United States. The clerk of court was to make a record of these proceedings, and “thereupon such person shall be considered as a citizen of the United States.”

The ATCS are living and change and grow…..You need to start growing as it is not 1790 anymore and things will continue to change for the better ever if you can not see it or like it. STOP picking pieces of old history that do not apply. BE OF good Moral character or as Jon Stewart would say

By: Hank

Hank — Mon, 26 Apr 2010 15:45:52 +0000

TXI says – “But those types of people are there, and from where I am sitting and watching, the movement (being as piecemeal as it is with all of the different organizations making up the movement) is not doing a good job casting out those who are taking things in a direction that is not beneficial to the movement.”

I’m with you on most of what you say, but I will take some issue with this statement.

Is it that they are not doing a good job of casting them out? Or is it that their detractors are doing a BETTER job of emphasizing them and trying to mainstream them?

By: TheTXI

TheTXI — Mon, 26 Apr 2010 10:27:48 +0000

@ChrisG:

You’re still trying to play the czars card, even though the list of “czar” positions between Bush and Obama are identical for the most part?

By: TheTXI

TheTXI — Mon, 26 Apr 2010 10:24:31 +0000

@ChrisG:

“I mean, why else would he need 30+ czars to run almost everything for him?”

http://www.factcheck.org/2009/09/czar-search/

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_U.S._executive_branch_czars

I can’t believe you guys are still trying to play the czars card.

By: TheTXI

TheTXI — Mon, 26 Apr 2010 10:22:59 +0000

@ChrisG:

“I mean, why else would he need 30+ czars to run almost everything for him?”

http://www.factcheck.org/2009/09/czar-search/

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_U.S._executive_branch_czars

Don’t let facts get in the way of a good narrative.

By: ChrisG

ChrisG — Mon, 26 Apr 2010 01:30:27 +0000

@Anomally100:

Agree to disagree. That is about all me and you can do. I believe Obama has socialist intentions. I mean, the guy was a member for 20 years of an American-hating church and CHOSE not to leave it UNTIL he ran for president. Try and argue that one.
The guy loves the book, “Rules for Radicals”. ZING!

C’mon Ano, are you really just gonna sit there and ignore that? Is your curiosity not sparked?

And about Bush and Obama. It is called RESPONSIBILITY. And both need to take their share of it. Obama needs to be held accountable for the crap he does, makes, and supports. He needs to stop blaming his favorite scapegoat so he doesn’t look like an amateur dipstick who doesn’t know what the heck he is doing. I mean, why else would he need 30+ czars to run almost everything for him?

By: Anomaly100

Anomaly100 — Mon, 26 Apr 2010 00:41:40 +0000

@ChrisG: Obviously, there is nothing racist about you. I'm sure no one else thinks you're a racist either. I've heard this complaint before with right wingers & essentially from most of them, I think it's a lockstep complaint. It's like this one: If someone mentions Bush, tell them, "Forget about Bush already" then in the same breath, every single issue in America is blamed on Obama. A lot of us have a very hard time with people we see protesting something that doesn't effect them. A lot of us have a hard time hearing about Birth certificates when McCain's citizenship was not in question. We hear Rush Limbaugh touted as, "Getting to the truth," yet he says racist remarks which are defended by right wingers. For instance, Rebel. He told me to give him an example of Limbaugh's racism. I gave him 25. He wouldn't acknowledge it. Do you see why sometimes leftists think these things? Nothing else would make sense. I've seen tapes where the videographer would ask a Tea Partier what issues they have with Obama. They couldn't name any. Someone would say, "his foreign policies" but when asked, they could cite no example. I could write volumes on this. In short, we are perplexed when Obama is called a Socialist. He is not a Socialist & are we to believe that this many people do not have a dictionary? Rebel called me a Communist. That's crazy. I hope he's reading this because he knows & I know the president is not, "socialist, Marxist, Maoist or communist" as has been suggested over an over again. But for you....you are not a racist and that's obvious. I feel you're misguided but you probably think the same about me.

By: ChrisG

ChrisG — Sun, 25 Apr 2010 22:44:19 +0000

@Anomally100:

Yeah, racism has gotten worse. But not the way you are thinking. Now, if you disagree with Obama, your a racist. If you attack his methods, your a racist. And, I have even been called a racist because I said I hate Obama’s policies and they will do more harm than good. That makes me a racist? I actually said the same thing about Bush when he tried that whole NAFTA deal. I guess that makes me a racist against my own skin color!

If you have, or can make free time in September, you are more than welcome to carpool with me to Washington D.C. I’ll keep tabs on NY rallies for you.

Also…I don’t just attend rallies here in NY. I go to D.C. too. And soon I’ll be going to others in the “middle”.

You can check out my photography on the Tea Parties I have gone to if you want. And if you dig nature, I have that too. I’m a freak for waterfalls, lol.
http://cgphotography.polrev.com/