Skip to content


Vote For Sharron Angle? Hell No We Won’t!

Without a doubt in the past, voter turnouts favor Republicans.  Democrats and Progressives need to glimpse into their future because if this poll is accurate, we’re going backwards in time.


(CNN) – Voter turnout could be crucial in the battle between Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid and his Republican challenger, Sharron Angle, and a new poll indicates that Republican voters in the state are more energized than their Democratic counterparts.


According to a Reuters/Ipsos survey of Nevada voters released Tuesday, 81 percent of Republicans say they are certain to vote on November 2, 17 points higher than the 64 percent of Democrats who say they’ll vote in the midterm elections.


If the thought of Sharron Angle doesn’t scare the hell out of you, then by all means, slack off but before you get too comfortable, read this:

CNN:

It’s pretty clear that “Sharron Angle has quickly become Harry Reid’s biggest asset,” says Alex Altman in Time. For Republicans, her foot-in-mouth candidacy is a cautionary tale about the “political dangers of the Tea Party’s quest for ideological purity.” But for Reid, “she may be a lifeline” in his once-doomed reelection bid. 
“Sharron Angle’s latest gaffe”

“Lemons into lemonade?” says Jim Newell in Gawker. Wow, what a “really awful metaphor choice.” Just because your anti-abortion stance is ideologically consistant” doesn’t mean you should try to “spin” being raped by your father “into positives.” No wonder she “refused to talk to any reporters for weeks.” 
“Wingnut candidate advises… incest victims to turn lemons into lemonade”

All right wing party’s will be voting for Angle:

According to the poll, one out of four Republican voters said they were more inclined to support Angle because she enjoys backing by Tea Party groups, with seven percent saying they are less likely to support Angle because of her Tea Party backing.

Angle transparency:

Swampland/Time

she’s threatening to sue Reid for posting her own political positions, ducking the press like the plague or forcing her staff to assure folks that no, she’s not in favor of armed revolution, Angle’s candidacy has underlined the political dangers of the Tea Party’s quest for ideological purity.


Angle wedged her foot in her mouth again. During an appearance on a Las Vegas radio show, she called BP’s $20 billion escrow account for oil spill victims a “slush fund” and chided President Obama for bullying private industry. “Government shouldn’t be doing that to a private company,” she said.


Reid’s campaign issued a statement on Angle’s remarks. “This pitiful attempt by Sharron Angle’s new DC handlers to back off her warm embrace of BP contradicts a record of consistently siding with big oil and against the victims of the tragedy in the Gulf.

The sole reason this woman is running against Harry Reid is because the other insane Republican/Tea Person, Sue Lowden. didn’t win against this candidate.  It’s a toss up as to which is more detached than the other.

TPM

Angle won the Republican primary despite polls generally showing her to be the weakest potential GOP candidate. She largely has Lowden to thank. The former state GOP chair had a rather amusing self-destruction after encouraging the use of barter in order to lower health care costs, pining for the days when her grandparents’ generation would bring a chick to the doctor.

We may not have to barter with chickens for health care, but with Angle, you may not get any since she deems health care to be against the First Commandment:

On Wednesday, the celestial threads took another turn towards the bizarre, as Nevada political reporter Jon Ralston uncovered an interview in which the Tea Party favorite said that actions of the federal government were a “violation of the First Commandment”

Even the Tea People take exception to her madness when she was a no show at a headline event with Sheriff Joe Arpaio. You remember Sheriff Joe don’t you?  Both were supported by the organizers of the Tea Party she was to attend, but didn’t.


Angle supports endorsements from the pulpit which should upset the church because their taxes would no longer be exempt, unless that is changing too? Angle wants to overturn the rights of the gay community to adopt children and has a strong stance against immigration reform, instead touting the new Arizona profiling law, which speaks volumes for her exclusion of the Latino vote.


As if she hasn’t ostracized enough voters, she should by all means loose the female vote, unless you live in Bedrock in the Stone Age. Sharron Angle does not advocate for single mothers or working mothers, like the days of old, Angle believes one parent should stay home with the children because it’s the, “acceptable right thing to do.”

h/t Fox (no, really)


Obviously, Sharron Angle has not heard the latest.  The days of one parent staying home has not been an option for many families for quite a long time.


Sharron Angle does not know the Constitution or doesn’t believe in it:

Huffpo:

In a June interview on Nevada’s KVBC’s news interview program “Face to Face with Jon Ralston,” Angle was asked about minutes from a 1995 legislative hearing in which she reportedly said the doctrine of church-state separation is unconstitutional. Asked on the program if the separation of church and state arises out of the Constitution, Angle answered “no.” She said Thomas Jefferson is often misquoted and that he wanted to protect churches from being taken over by a state religion. The drafters of the Constitution “didn’t mean that we couldn’t bring our values to the political forum,” she said.


The multitude of  Sharron Angle gaffes would overwhelm this post and even Republicans are feigning naivete hoping we don’t notice the most recent one.  A good question is, did you notice? Unquestionably she has no resolve to the issues she objects to which makes it apparent that this is just more monotony of the Party of No.  Conservatives, Republicans, Independents and Tea People are the same party because they’ll all vote for Angle no matter how deranged she appears to be..


To recap, Angle has ostracized the Latino, female and LGBT vote.  Her support from the Tea People leaves many minorities to question her stance on racism, after all, racist Mark Williams of the Tea Party Express helped make Angle a  contender for this race.  The only category Angle hasn’t singled out, is the white vote. This is not an attempt at playing the race card as right wingers would love for the voting public to believe. This is Sharron Angle.  Her take on The Constitution as well as The Bible is astoundingly ignorant.


If you have a Twitter account the hashtag is #NVsen. Use it. If you have a blog, use it. If you have accounts at Digg.com, Stumble Upon, Reddit or Facebook, by all means, use it. If you have a voice, use it. If you live in Nevada, get out there and vote. There are no excuses.


The time is now. Move it!





This post is inspired by @Neoblaque and @Stone_Circle. Keep it up.






Image courtesy of LA Progressive

Vote for Harry Reid. Let’s Move Forward!

Posted in Politics.

Tagged with , , , , , .

  • http://twitter.com/kindcutesteve/status/25239811544 Stephen Gary

    Vote for Sharron Angle? "HELL NO I WON"T voted GOP in past, not traditional; too wacky, no choice but DEM http://is.gd/fnzmL #NVsen #p2

  • kfreed

    The answer to your question, as you already knew, is that the GOP tea party voters would vote for Angle even if she said she’d line them all up against the wall and shoot them in the head. That’s how politically and intellectually savvy these people are. So much for patriotism – “I’d vote for Osama Bin Laden…” I don’t doubt it. Why did you even bother? Offer the information to individuals capable of processing it. Don’t waste your time on the tea party pod people.

    • Hank

      @kfreed, Two things. I did not say I’d vote for Bin Laden. I said it would be a toss up.

      And we ARE “politically and intellectually savvy” which is precisely why we would do anything within reason to defeat Reid. Pelosi, Boxer, Frank, Dodd…….

  • SayWhatWingnut??

    I’m gone a couple of days and they want to lynch poor Harry Reid. Vote Harry Reid for Senate. I guess I showed Hank and Jamie!

  • http://FreakOutNation.com Anomaly100

    @Hank, MORE deflecting? Wow. If those two crazy women were (say it with me now) running against Harry Reid, who would you vote for? (It’s not that I don’t know the answer, but I want to hear…err…read? you say it) For a man such as yourself to dismiss this woman’s insanity and embrace her as a good candidate against anyone, well I need to see this. As I said, if they were Democrats, I’d vote against them and vote Republican. (you can imagine how painful that was for me to type)

    • Hank

      @Anomaly100, How can I make it more clear. If Osama Bin Laden were running against Reid, it would be a toss up. I would vote for You Know Who over Reid.

      And yes, given the opportunity, I would ignore the out of context sound bites and vote for Angle over Reid.

      Reid needs to go. Replace him with a cabbage and it would be an improvement.

      • kfreed

        @Hank,

        That’s rich: “out of context sound bites”… these are her positions. Shouldn’t you, of all people, know that? Or were you all hoping that shielding her from the press would keep her views a secret just between tea baggers?

    • Hank

      @Anomaly100, “For a man such as yourself to dismiss this woman’s insanity and embrace her as a good candidate against anyone…”

      It’s like the last Presidential Election. It’s not necessarily that she is a “good” candidate. She is the least worst candidate. You pick between the lesser of two evils!

    • http://twitter.com/richardlaksana/status/21403646385 Richard Laksana

      Vote For Sharron Angle? Hell No We Won't! – http://su.pr/1NK5se

      • http://twitter.com/sindad1/status/21275918572 Robert Hill

        RT @Anomaly100: New Blog Post~ Vote For Sharron Angle? Hell No We Won't! #p2 #p2b http://is.gd/ejm64 #dnj #NVSen

  • Jamie

    I agree with Hank. We need to get the Pelosi crowd out!

    • http://twitter.com/crewislife/status/21295546620 Bret

      Vote For Sharron Angle? Hell No We Won’t! http://bit.ly/9BR2pc (by @Anomaly100 via @FreakOutNation) #p2 #teaparty #wingnut #fringe #NV

      • http://twitter.com/cafalk/status/21275891785 Carol Falk

        RT @FreakOutNation: New Blog Post~ Vote For Sharron Angle? Hell No We Won't! #p2 #p2b http://is.gd/ejm64 #dnj #NVSen

  • http://twitter.com/p2blogs/status/21278808348 P2 Blogs

    RT @FreakOutNation: New Blog Post~ Vote For Sharron Angle? Hell No We Won't! #p2 http://is.gd/ejm64 #dnj #NVSen: http://bit.ly/9gqr6W

  • http://twitter.com/p2blogs/status/21278807689 P2 Blogs

    RT @Anomaly100: New Blog Post~ Vote For Sharron Angle? Hell No We Won't! #p2 http://is.gd/ejm64 #dnj #NVSen: http://bit.ly/dAa2dK

  • http://twitter.com/p2blogs/status/21278164414 P2 Blogs

    From @FreakOutNation Vote For Sharron Angle? Hell No We Won’t!: Without a doubt in the past, vot… http://bit.ly/a0secx #p2 #du1 #njp #p2b

  • http://twitter.com/shivabeach/status/21277218295 Shiva

    RT @FreakOutNation: Vote For Sharron Angle? Hell No We Won't! #p2 #p2b http://is.gd/ejm64

  • Hank

    That’s pretty sad. Reid’s chances to win hinge on the opinion that his opponent is a nut case.

    Doesn’t speak too well for what people think of Reid. Given that, shouldn’t he have an overwhelming lead instead of a reasonable to good chance of losing? I’m not sure this whole scenario, the way you guys set it up, is anything to brag about.

    Looks like the best thing you will be able to say post election (if it goes that way) is that Reid eked out a victory over a complete whack job!!

  • http://FreakOutNation.com Anomaly100

    @Hank, You’re deflecting. What do you think of Sharron Angle? I’d like just one Conservative to be honest with me about her and Michele Bachmann but I have yet to see it. She’s crazy.

  • Hank

    @Anomaly100, What I think of either of them is immaterial. I do not live in either of their states and can’t vote for or against them. I just think it’s pathetic that people are applauding the fact that Reid may eke out a win because (in your opinion) his opponent is certifiably whacked!

  • http://FreakOutNation.com Anomaly100

    @Hank, You’re now deflecting about deflecting? The question is not immaterial. If this woman was running for office in Tennessee, would you vote for her? I ask the same in regards to Michele Bachmann. If either one of them were Democrats, I’d vote the other way, on your side of the aisle. Where do they get these people? I’m thinking they round them up at a psychiatric hospital.

  • http://www.success-ladder.com/2010/08/09/pride-comes-before-a-fall-and-then-some/ the Success Ladder

    Thank you very much for sharing this. I have subscribed to your RSS feed. Please keep up the good work.

  • Hank

    @Anomaly100, A lot would have to do with who they were running against. But if they were running against Reid, Boxer, Pelosi, Frank, Franken..I’m sure there are others, I’d vote for either of them against THIS crew of stooges.

    Angle vs Reid to me would be a no brainer. I’ll take crazy over inept and arrogant anytime.