Dumbass Coach Fired After Sending TeaTarded Song To Students’ Parents

My kid has to read Obama’s book and Al Gore’s book as required reading in an advanced high school English class. I’m offended. Oh, that’s right. Nobody cares if a white, middle class, Christian, conservative is offended. Just like a liberal. If you don’t like it, nobody gets to. If a conservative doesn’t like it, they delete it, turn the channel, turn the page, or ignore it. Who gave anyone the right to never be offended? The ACLU, NAACP, et al.

Shiva..It appears to be useless. I have noted several times the hypocrisy applies to both sides. You just ignore that and barrel ahead in some sort of state of denial. This is a Liberal Blog. It doesn’t present much opportunity to note that a “Conservative” post is hypocritical. And in that I am the only Conservative consistently posting here, you have at least attempted to note what you perceive as my hypocrisy on numerous occasions. If you have a point on that, I’m not sure I understand or recognize it.

And you personify what Krauthammer says and what I wholly agree with. Your “opinion” is that whatever I say can’t possibly be a “personal” opinion. It’s just simply a Conservative Talking Point.

I will agree with one thing you say. Best to move along. Your circular arguments leave nothing to be seen.

RT @Anomaly100: Blog Post: Dumbass Coach Fired After Sending TeaTarded Song To Students' Parents #p2 #p2b http://is.gd/eYeJi #dnj

We need to find this guy and get him fired too!!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ettl3zfLWus

Next week’s lesson for these kids will be in spelling. How to spell “H-Y-P-O-C-R-I-S-Y”!!

@Hank, I’m not quite sure why every time there is an article you have to run out and find someone else and go well he did it why isn’t he fired?

@Hank — not sure if you’ll find this funny…and not sure it’ll make it past moderation…but have you seen this?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vdCA5xAsw8I

…it kind of reminded me of how conservatives want to be treated, even after losing majority control of all three branches of government and nearly destroying the nation.

@Hank, it’s not necessarily clear violation of his First Amendment rights. Remember the schools where teachers for pictures of them on their Facebook pages drinking a beer. I believe in you sign a contract be a teacher there are certain rules you have to follow called moral turpitude. I’m not saying he broke them that someone has determined that he did

@Shiva, That makes no sense. I’m simply saying be consistent. And attempt to avoid hypocrisy.

I have a Daughter who is a Teacher and (not very brightly in my opinion) has a Face Book page also. I am constantly reminding her she has to be cognizant of her position at all times. Even in public conversations. We have been sitting together at a High School Ball Game and she has made a comment that might be deemed “inappropriate” if heard by the wrong person. While in reality, the only thing she was doing was relating her work experience with her Dad. I try to caution her always.

Look, if you want to comment on a site where no one will ask questions. Where no one is allowed to voice an opposing opinion. Where censorship and editorial deletion is the order, you know where to find it, north of the border. If not, email me on the side and I can point you to it.

I consider it my duty, as an opposing ideologue, to present another viewpoint. Personally, I like and respect Anomaly. I could just keep quiet, or do like JW and just sit here and tell her how witty and intelligent she is and never disagree with anything. But I see and view the world differently.

Having a dialogue where no one questions you and all commenters are allowed to do is sit back and “Ooohhh” and “Ahhhh” your self perceived witty remarks is not interesting and certainly neither challenging nor entertaining.

I guess I could say I’m sorry if my pointing out the inconsistency and hypocrisy of a post seems to disturb you…..but I’m not. I don’t care.

@Shiva, First…it’s my “Daughter”.

My comment re: censorship and editorial deletion is a reference to a blog that practices precisely that and is operated by a Canadian citizen…and which I know you have contributed to in the past. I can’t identify it because that individual is also an abusive degenerate that attacks and abuses women.

I simply try to point people to examples that are excused because it agrees with their ideology. For example, there is a discussion on another site. A lady, who adamantly supported the building of the GZ Mosque, while dismissing opinion that maybe it just shouldn’t be built there because it is an inappropriate location, took the position re: burning the Qu’ran, that just because they have the right to do it, doesn’t mean they should.

Wouldn’t any reasonably intelligent person take note that that is not consistent thinking??

You really are going to have to pay closer attention and not run off with knee jerk commentary. My comment re: “…your self perceived witty remarks…” is taken out of context (no surprise there ) but was not directed at you.

@GreyHawk, Cute. Particularly the twist at the end.

@Hank, as to your sister, you are absolutely spot on. If I were in her position my coverage on the Internet would be practically zero. Or at least it would be far better hidden.

I’m not sure what your comment about censorship and editorial deletion being north of the border is, Canada is a pretty free and open society.

I would still ask, why do you have to run out every single time and stick something out there that says “Well well well… what about this guy”?

The person who posted this was not being inconsistent or hypocritical. Of course you know as I note below, that I could do this to every single post that you post. And show you to be the inconsistent and hypocritical person

“your self perceived witty remarks is not interesting and certainly neither challenging nor entertaining.”

all I did was ask why you constantly go out and grab something out of ethernet. I think you are paranoid and going way out of your way to say absolutely nothing

@Shiva, Well….not much of what you say here is worthy of a response. It’s “Talking points” on my part but “political opinion” on your part. No problem. I can live with that.

Honestly, I think Krauthammer’s observation was spot on and long overdue. I have been making this argument for well over a year. With the caveat that both sides can be guilty.

You say, “Just because I have a political opinion you apply it to the arrogant elites.”….and I would respond, Just because I have a political opinion, you label it “talking points”.

Thus, Krauthammer’s observation, with my caveat of “equal abuse”, is proven.

Now, please explain to an audience breathlessly waiting, how that is hypocritical?

@Hank,

I have absolutely no idea which blog you are talking about so I will just let that go.

it is not hypocritical of a person who posts an article and fails to post an article that you believe should have been mentioned. It is not up to the person posting the article to cover every base that you believe should be covered.